A billboard displaying the message “All eyes on the judiciary” was recently removed in Nigeria’s Federal Capital Territory, sparking controversy and discussions about its implications for the ongoing Presidential Election Petition Tribunal. This action has been perceived by some stakeholders as an attempt to exert pressure on the judiciary in anticipation of the tribunal’s ruling on the February 25 presidential election.
The judicial process in Nigeria has attracted significant attention, as the judiciary is seen as the last resort for justice and has been both commended and criticized for its decisions. The current focus is on two petitions filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Labour Party, and their presidential candidates, Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi respectively.
Despite the Independent National Electoral Commission declaring Bola Tinubu the winner of the presidential election, Atiku and Obi contested the outcome, alleging non-compliance with the Electoral Act and other issues. The election tribunal is now close to delivering its ruling on these petitions.
The removal of the billboard has sparked debates about the intentions behind its placement and the potential influence on the tribunal. Supporters of Atiku and Obi believe that the message on the billboard is a call for the judiciary to dispense justice without bias.
The controversy arises in the context of concerns about the impartiality of the judiciary. Reports have indicated instances of corruption within the judicial sector, which has led to calls for transparency and ethical conduct. The contentious nature of some past judicial decisions has raised questions about the judiciary’s independence and integrity.
Prominent Nigerians have shared differing opinions on the removal of the billboard. Some view it as a form of intimidation and suppression of freedom of speech, while others believe it is essential to protect the judiciary from undue influence.
Amidst these debates, legal experts emphasize the importance of allowing the judiciary to operate independently without external pressures. Regardless of the outcome of the tribunal’s ruling, it is essential for all parties to accept the decision in order to uphold the rule of law and democratic principles.
As Nigeria awaits the tribunal’s verdict, the hope is that the judiciary will fulfill its role impartially, guided by evidence, legal standards, and the best interests of the nation.